OneThing13: the model’s the thing

The-Map-is-not-the-Territory Guy

He’s looking a bit put out, isn’t he?  Poor Alfred Korzybski, he looks as if no one has paid his ideas any mind. And he’s probably right.

If your average teenager stumbled upon this image, just how fast might the back button be pushed?  He’s serious, he’s old, he has words like “multiconditionality” on the board, and it’s a black and white photograph.

But I am thinking that he and folks like him – Gregory Bateson also comes to mind – are exactly what’s needed in the schools of education across the US.

What does it mean, as Korzybski famously said,  that “the map is not the territory”? Let me take a stab.

I really don’t know what the United States looks like.  Out my window in Milwaukie, Oregon, (suburb south of Portland), I see the roofs of two houses, the tops of 11 Douglas Fir trees, the empty branches of one poplar and two maples, and 14 electrical wires stretched from one pole to houses and posts out of my vision.  The sky is cloud-covered.  The vegetation dormant.  In other words, I know what my dot of the US looks like (45.4559 x -122.6084); and I know what it looks like right now.  At night? Yesterday? Tomorrow?  Hard to say with any accuracy.  I can also faintly recall a few places I’ve been, some more frequently than others:  Mt. Hood, the Oregon Coast, my parents house in SE Portland; and some places just once: Burlington, VT; Moab, UT; in my high school girlfriend’s basement.

Now, I have flown over vast stretches of the United States.  I have stood on both coasts.  And I’ve looked at magazines and photographs of various places all over the country.  I even have a jar of dirt from my grandparents farm in Nebraska.  And we have a map of the United States in the kitchen.  I visit my family in Seattle, Reno, Eugene, Beaverton, Forest Grove, and Portland.  But I don’t really know much about the United States.

What’s in my head are models, abstractions Korzybski called them.  When our mental models more closely and minutely align with the actual, we live better.  But it’s so hard, since our capacity to experience is shrouded by layers of abstractions, not the least of which is scattered on the screen you are now reading.  When I say “Douglas Fir,” what image pops in your head?

Schools and education are perilously far away from this.  We ought to be about model-building, experimentation, refinement, experiencing.



4 comments on “OneThing13: the model’s the thing

  1. Pingback: OneThing30: I’ll show you my mental model, if you show me yours « itsallonething

  2. I think he looks quite cool. though he had some really good ideas, they weren’t all that easy to follow … have you seen the size and felt the weight of his “Science and Sanity”? (if there was a button for it I considered submitting a photo).
    Multiconditionality (great word) is not as off putting as bringing ‘The Structural Differential’ into the classroom, which he suggests in his section on non-Aristotelian training.
    I would love to see that!

  3. Pingback: OneThing20: how mind and nature might connect « itsallonething

  4. Really enjoyed this one 🙂

    Also, this reminded me that I’ve been meaning to mention a book to you, “Through the Language Glass: Why the World Looks Different in Other Languages” by Guy Deutscher. (It’s a pretty quick read despite the unwieldy title)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s